The Complicated Joy of Soccer

(P/C:Manuel Fasico)

This is ostensibly a platform for me to write about American soccer -- MLS and USL, and that's what I've used it for. To frame this differently, I've intentionally boundaried this space from the other topics I often write about: politics and religion. 

It seems, though, like the time has come to take down those walls, if only for a little while, to acknowledge that while the soccer is center stage during the World Cup, the world's game is equal parts relief from an unending barrage of socio-political upheaval as it is deeply enmeshed in that very same turbulence. 

That's not breaking news to anyone reading this, but it does warrant saying out loud. 

I, like many others following this tournament, have chosen to use my social media platforms to comment almost exclusively on the games (matches) themselves. 

For me, this has been a very intentional choice –– opening the door, even just slightly ajar, to the abyss that is everything besides the games felt as though I'd never be able to watch with any joy at all. 

That was the wrong choice. 

The tournament itself has been perhaps the best World Cup in modern memory –– a hypothesis underscored by today's stunning Belgian counter attack for the ages. But while Lukaku was somehow in a state of mind to let a lifetime of glory roll between his legs (certainly the most glorious "dummy" I've ever seen), my mind was drifting to a world fraught with war, hunger, isolation and desolation. 

As Chadli formalized the most famous six touches in Belgian footballing history I  could only think: damn you, Vladimir. 

Not only is your side through to the quarterfinals amid doping rumors, you're playing host to an unimaginably good sporting event. One that will be remembered forever alongside your thuggery, murder, and hijacking of history. 

While this isn't the first World Cup to be played under the smoke of a burning world, it is the first one since 1934 that's been so intertwined with it –– FIFA's now exposed corruption fully welcomed in Putin's Moscow. 

It's all so inescapable. 

I've been challenged by the reporting of Clint Smith, Laurent Dubois, and Karim Zidan as well as few others during the course of this tournament to see the whole, complex, story unfolding before us. That while we enjoy the sport we can––and must––engage with the world that remains lest our temporary joy be the tyrant's permission.

Landon Donavan, El Tri, and US Soccer's never ending issues

In the absence of actual World Cup games featuring the United States Men's National Team,  #USMNT twitter went off the rails today when Well's Fargo launched a social media ad campaign featuring Landon Donovan utilizing #MyOtherTeamisMexico.

Donavan, predictably, was on the receiving end of immediate backlash from fans and former national team players alike -- most notably Carlos Bocanegera and Herculez Gomez.

This is an incredibly terrible take. Questioning ones loyalties to culture and/or heritage because HE questioned YOU for taking marketing dollars to “root” for your SPORTING RIVAL?

You can hate El Tri- this doesn’t mean you have anything against Mexicans. ✊🏼 🇲🇽 🇺🇸 https://t.co/xF9JCI1qBC

— herculez gomez (@herculezg) June 16, 2018

Behind the social media fiasco--which takes on additional meaning given our socio-political moment--is something worth talking about, though.

There's a real tension and, frankly, ignorance around the multicultural identity of the men's national team. Wells Fargo's ad is based in the assumption that there's significant overlap between soccer fans living in the United States, but of Mexican citizenship or descent.

As a brand, Wells Fargo clearly preferred to build an ad campaign around an American team in the World Cup but weren't willing to be sidelined during the month long tournament once the USMNT failed to qualify.

The strategy was basically to put the core elements of their ideal campaign into a blender. What came out was the most iconic player in American history pimping a corporate sponsorship by endorsing America's biggest soccer rival. (Of course it's even more layered than that given Donavan's exit from the national team.)

As dumb as all this sounds, it's basically the same approach major stake holders--including U.S. Soccer--have taken over the last two-plus decades in an attempt to "grow the game" in America, and the results have been similar.

Paying lip-service to the "emerging Latino market" has landed America's soccer gatekeepers in trouble before.

Perhaps the most obvious example is the Chivas U.S.A debacle, but there are others more specific to the national team. Just look to the youth development foibles of the late. (I wrote about the Jonathan Gonzales situation on this blog.) Or at the tension around Klinsmann preferencing German-American players.

These are the direct result of cultural incompetency -- a misunderstanding of how complex the mixture of sport, culture and identity are.

My point tonight isn't to write in-depth about each and every instance of cultural incompetency, nor is it even to delve into solutions. It's simply to say: these aren't just gaffes to paper over.  This is difficult stuff that should occupy both America's soccer intelligentsia and it's executives. 

How Good are the Foxes? Pt. 2

Continuing in this series, "How good are the Foxes?" 

The question for me, this time, is how good is Noah Verhoeven? 

Verhoeven is the one legitimate MLS prospect on the Fresno FC roster in 2018. At 18, Verhoeven is a product of the Vancouver Whitecaps residency training program. He's also been called in to U.S. under-18 and under-20 training camps. 

While Verhoeven profiles ahead of the rest of the roster as a pure prospect he's not the only MLS calibre player in the Foxes XI. 

Pedro Ribeiro, who's recent golazo got international attention, has logged substantial time for Orlando City SC. It was Verhoeven who delivered the ball to Ribeiro to setup the screamer from distance in the 27th minute. 

Cutting in, hard, from left side Verhoeven shows in the highlight the most appealing aspect of his game -- sudden, attacking, movement with the ball on his foot. The lay-off to Ribeiro was the obvious choice; and frankly isn't an overly impressive play in-and-of-itself (it was 99% Ribeiro's individual brilliance). However, the cutback; on to his right-foot, is really good.

For the Foxes to improve, and for Verhoeven to take the next step in his development, he needs to build on his tendency to dribble the ball for the purpose of creating passing lanes and instead push the ball to create his own scoring opportunities. 

Take a look at his chart vs. Tulsa: one shot in Zone 17. 

Now, he's playing wide in a 4-4-2, so his primary responsibility is to find Caffa (and whoever is playing beside him) in the channel he [Verhoeven] has created because of his pace and space. BUT, to truly unlock a dynamic attack Verhoeven simply has to put his head down and go at goal at least a couple of times every '45.

When he gets comfortable enough in the system to play with some ambition, watch out! He certainly has the skillset to do it.  

How Good are the Foxes? Pt.1

To answer that we have to answer, "How good is Juan Pablo Caffa?"

Fresno FC are lead by the veteran Argentinean. With two seasons in La Liga, at Real Betis ('06-'08), Caffa is--by far--the most accomplished player on the roster, and one of the most experienced players in the league.

That said, Caffa's days as a rotation player at the highest level of Europe are more than a decade behind him. While he's still the technical class of any Foxes XI, his ability to play at pace is substantially diminished. Don't believe me? Check out his separation and finishing once upon a time.

(I believe this is from the '02-'03 season with Boca Juniors)

At 33, his play is forced to be far more cerebral; and by all accounts focused on connecting with younger player.

So, how's he doing in that role for Fresno FC? 

Through five matches I'd say it's been a mixed bag. During the home--and season--opener versus Las Vegas FC Caffa was conspicuously absent from the Foxes attacking play. 

His first-half heat map was more or less what Coach Adam Smith was looking for –– heavy to the left-side and relatively prevalent in Zone 14.

However, when you overlay that with his passing/shot chart, the result isn't nearly as impactful. Takeaway the one set piece shot, which was threatening and on-frame, and Caffa only made one attacking pass from Zone 14 into Zone 17 in 49:00. 

What's more, after falling behind 0-3 in the second half, Caffa dropped deeper, and deeper, as the game progressed to pick up the ball. Here's his 2nd Half heat map:

Suffice to say this isn't what you're looking for from your best creator. Compare the LVFC chart to  Caffa's contribution in what was likely the club's best performance in a road win at Seattle Sounders 2:

Positionally, this is much more in-line with where I want to see Caffa on the ball –– though not exactly where I'd like to see him. 

(A brief aside: It should be said, the Foxes have played in several formations so far this season, and have even played a few different attacking concepts within the formations they're going to regularly; like the 4-4-2. So, doing a direct game-to-game comparison  of a single player isn't going to be super fruitful. However, from my persecutive, the relevant question to ask of any formation is, "is this putting the best attacking players on the ball in attacking positions?" With a player like Caffa in particular, the goal is to get him the ball in space with time to create.) 

Given the nature of a totally new club, with a coaching staff and players learning each others strengths and tendencies, it's not at all surprising to me that it's taking a bit of time to sort out how to get your best player(s) consistently good looks to create goal-scoring chances.

Caffa is certainly [still] technically and tactically good enough to impact every game in a positive way for the Foxes. Time will tell if he's given the freedom to do so. 

U.S. Soccer Youth Development -- Part 2

In Part 1, I highlighted two issues that are critical to solve for successful youth development: 

1. Difficulty finding quality coaching; and the cost(s) associated with accessing quality coaching 
2. As a result of the first point, youth development is still built largely around upper-middle class white families.

So in Part 2, it seems important to spend some extended time on why diversity matters both in terms of the on-field results and in terms of creating a healthy, well functioning, national soccer federation. 

In terms of fielding globally competitive teams at each age group; including the senior team, developing players of diverse backgrounds is a non-negotiable. 

As I've previously eluded to, culture influences style(s) of play in very direct ways and sets the foundational or platonic ideal of what it means to be a great player. 

Mexicans and Germans, for example, have different--if not competing--epistemological concepts of greatness on the pitch. 

If you're unread in this subject area, I suggest starting with Johnathan Wilson's classic, "Inverting the Pyramid" as well as Franklin Foer's, "How Soccer Explains the World".

Given, then, that players from diverse backgrounds carry with them different basic understandings, based on core cultural values, of how to solve on-field problems integrating America's diverse soccer playing population into a coherent soccer "worldview" becomes a mission-critical objective. 

And, to be fair, under the direction of Tab Ramos there has been noticeable improvement integrating Latino players and styles into the American playing paradigm. 

However, the fact remains Latino players in particular are not well integrated, understood or valued in on-field terms within U.S. Soccer (to say nothing of lifestyle or cultural obstacles) -- particularly at the senior team level. Don't take my word on it. Read this excellent interview in SoccerAmerica. 

Brad Rothenberg, who's as qualified as anyone to speak on this subject, details the dynamic in very plain terms. In the most telling except (for me), Rothenberg says,

I’ve grown tired of watching our federation neglect this community. We didn’t do enough, not nearly enough, to keep him. And the worst part is that it will continue if wholesale changes aren’t made in the approach to finding talent in this community.The paucity of coaches employed by U.S. Soccer with an interest in Latino style of play is a problem. Tab Ramos isn’t enough. Bring back Hugo Perez. Jonathan wasn’t the first and will not be the last player lost to the national team until major shifts take place at the federation.

Not only does this ring true based on my personal experience as a youth coach in an exclusively Latino context, it lays bare the basic reality that U.S. Soccer is not trying to put the best possible combination of players on the field.

To put it another way, by not actively cultivating, training and financially investing in Latino players and coaches U.S. Soccer is acting in direct opposition to it's core mission.

(This seems to be a good stopping point, so I'll write Part 3 about the organizational aspects of diversity another night.)

More to come...

Jonathan Gonzalez and USMNT Youth Development -- Part 1

Jonathan Gonzalez shook-up what was going to be an otherwise nondescript January camp by letting it be known he's going to play for El Tri at the senior national team level; meaning he will be "cap-tied" to Mexico going forward. 

As this relates to Gonzalez, it's a big deal because he's an elite-level young player. The U.S. Men's National Team certainly would benefit from his skillset as a shut down d-mid as the current positional core group phases out prior to the 2022 cycle.

If you want to read more about the Gonzalez situation specifically, I suggest Steve Davis' piece in FourFourTwo and Matt Doyle's "Arm Chair Analyst" column on the subject. 

What I'm most interested--and have tweeted about extensively--is the underlying issue(s) US Soccer has within its player development paradigm relative to Latino players. Specifically, Mexican-American players. 

Two basic but critical structural issues to highlight:

• High-level coaching is extremely difficult to find and it's incredibly expensive to utilize. This is exact opposite of an effective strategy to develop the widest array of potential USMNT players as is possible; which one would assume should be the goal of US Soccer. 
• Youth player development is (still) built around white upper-middle class families. The stereotypes of soccer mom's exist for a reason. With the switch to a quasi-academy model in 2007 players need access to one of 197 affiliate clubs. These clubs need to fund their coaches, trainers, equipment, etc. to do that, they need enough players who can pay their full fees to offset the scholarship players. It's pretty simple, really.

There's more to each point, clearly, but the net-effect is that because of these issues there are entire communities disconnected from US Soccer's youth development project. It gets even worse when you realize that the communities which are being left aside are the talent producing ones. To put it another way, the "system" isn't designed for Mexican-American youth to be identified and/or developed by-and-large.

As a result, when a dual-eligible player like Gonzalez is available and chooses to play for Mexico, it's a huge blow because there aren't hundreds prospects lineup to take his place; which is a shame because there should be.   

More to come...